Page One Post


Brash Affair: Day 5

The Herald on Sunday publish their poll showing little impact on either National's or Don Brash's popularity. On Brash's leadership it states:

Brash is expected to put his leadership on the line at National's caucus meeting on September 26.

They also have comment from "the other woman" Diane Foreman, both parties have neither confirmed nor denied the affair.

The Sunday Star Times carries the story about Investigate Magazine alledging Peter Davis is gay. Whilst not an attack from National, many will probably see this as pay back.

Labour moots retrospective legislation to solve campaign funding

August 7 - August 13

Despite this week being a recess it was still packed with events that could have repercussions for many years. The election funding scandal has begun to dominate the political headlines now the Taito Phillip Field fiasco has died down without the oxygen of Parliament.

Election campaign funding

National grabbed the moral high ground on Thursday writing a cheque for $10,588.17, the amount identified in the Auditor-General's draft report as being illegally spent by seven individual National MPs contrary to the rules. All other parties are contesting the Auditor-General's findings and believe because they have always spent the money illegally, they should be allowed to continue.

Labour has engaged in a number of tactics, their first was to dispute the draft report and stick to their claims the rules were too unclear to come to any definitive finding. Secondly they floated the stupid idea of state funding for political parties, David Farrar points out this removes a necessary discipline on political parties, but probably also points to financial troubles within Labour resulting from the last election campaign. Finally, Michael Cullen promised to tidy up the situation by passing "validating", really "retrospective" legislation.

"I think it most likely that we will have to consider validation not just for the last few months of 2005 but going back, as I said, into the 1980s."Dr Cullen said decision to pay back the $10,000 was a "cheap move" by National leader Don Brash to grab the high ground.
Surely Labour can see the shit fight it will create in Parliament as it tries to pass a law saving their own butts.

McCully.co points out Winston Peters' position on this is very different to the one he took only a few months ago when challenging Tauranga MP Bob Clarkson in court over his campaign spending. Consistency has never been his strong point, nevermind, he's only our Foreign Minister.

So following on from the questions regarding immigration practices, especially David Cunliffe, National has another issue which can damage the government's credibility as a clean, honest government.

Taito Phillip Field

Unsurprisingly the Labour Department this week announced they would not conduct their own investigation into the activities of Thai painters and tilers in Mangere and Samoa. I would be more interested to hear what IRD are doing, their powers are far greater and their determination much stronger than other investigative arms of government.

Energy Regulations

Energy minister David Parker has threatened to enact government control over infrastructure planning if the Electricity Commission and TransPower cannot resolve their dispute over upgrades to the national grid. Ever since the publicly popular unbundling of Telecom's local loop, Labour's confidence to intervene has increased. Although, as shown by the Commerce Commission's report on Vector last week, the same week Labour issued a directive that infrastructure investment (ie. making profits) was more important than holding minimal prices, the government does not always get their way.

Buy Kiwi Made

If I was in the Greens I would be hugely upset at Labour's push to include not only Kiwi made products but also Chinese made/Kiwi designed products included in the campaign. Surely this defeats the whole purpose which was to ensure manufacturing remains in New Zealand, as stated by Sue Bradford only three weeks ago:

“Frankly I cannot agree to do this. I feel that this would defeat the whole purpose of the campaign. I would be letting Rod Donald down, I would be letting the Green Party down, I would be letting New Zealand manufacturers down….”

Hmmm, the old Rod Donald excuse, shame on the Greens.

Google News Survey

Helen Clark: 44
Don Brash: 30

technorati tags:,

Field problems continuing

Helen Clark must be frustrated at the continuing media attention being generated by Taito Phillip Field. After weeks of questioning in the House the issue will still not burn out and Labour is being forced into increasing - rather than decreasing - damage control.

Clark's language around the issue has changed. This Newsroom article dating from the report's release shows Clark softening the blow and talking around Field's return to cabinet.

Standing alongside Mr Field, Miss Clark said he had work to do to regain his portfolios but she had seen people work their way back before. ... Miss Clark defended the lack of further repercussions for Mr Field, who lost his ministerial job after the election. Mr Field was no longer a minister, she argued ... Miss Clark accepted that the report raised issues of judgement and she said these would be worked through.

Compare that to more recent language where Clark said Field had been "punished" and "humiliated". She also forced Field to apologize something she did not do immediately the report was released. It is obvious National's attacks are slowly wearing down Labour, illustrated by media rumours that the issue was to be discussed in caucus this week at the insistence of backbenchers.

Following on from the David Benson-Pope and David Parker incidents earlier in the year, it is another expensive exercise in spending political capital for Clark and her cabinet. While Field did not have the public profile for his behaviour to prove fatal, it adds to National's painting of Labour has corrupted by power.

Tags:

Why moving on doesn't clear the air

Watkins in the Dom Post compares the disciplining of MPs between Britain and New Zealand, concluding a cross-party committee is not conducive to either Labour party's management style.

Miss Clark has opted fort he "tough it out" and "move on" approach, which is why she has resisted calls to pursue the lines of inquiry left open by the Ingram report, even though it posed as many questions as it answered. Whereas, of course, a cross-party code of conduct inquiry just might open those lines of inquiry and could drag on for weeks. Neither possibility is conducive to the "let's move on" school of political management.

Tags:

Peters kowtows to Indonesians

Bali bomber Abu Baka Bashir has been released from Indonesia prison after only 26 months. Australia Prime Minister John Howard has written to the Indonesians to protest and will raise the matter personally in an upcoming summit. Compare that to our Foreign Minister, Winston Peter's response - nothing.

"What can we now possibly raise with Indonesia that has any merit other than an attempt to interfere with the law of Indonesia and its processes?"

In his appearance before the Foreign Affairs select committee this week, Peters continued his war with the NZ Herald by refuting earlier observations Phil Goff was the real foreign minister. The fact he felt it necessary to defend himself contrasts with his claims he is not concerned:

"It's water off my back but the fact that somebody internationally might perceive that to be a truthful statement is what I am concerned about."

Previous: Peters wimps out of Timor visit
Tags:

Civil Defence in chaos

Rick Barker is making a meal out of the Civil Defence portfolio. Following the fiasco of the tsunami that wasn't, heavy snow in South Canterbury has forced the minister to reveal embarrassing insights - like the fact he did not realise it took electricity to pump water and run cell phone towers. In today's NZ Herald, John Armstrong writes:

If it has seemed in recent weeks as if Civil Defence is auditioning for some modern-day version of Dad's Army, there is now a simple explanation - the ministry's officials may merely be following the orders of their minister...

Mr Carter then contrasted the Prime Minister's statement that she was happy with Civil Defence's response with Mr Barker's insistence that things could have been done better. Who was right - Mr Barker or the Prime Minister? ... there was only one answer, even though it meant contradicting everything he had said about learning from mistakes.

Clark silent on Singapore's human rights

One of the main reasons why a young Helen Clark entered politics was to campaign for international human rights, therefore it is surprising she has decided to give visiting Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong a free ride on the issue. This is in stark contrast to her comments through the 1990s, especially regarding National Prime Minister Jenny Shipley's relationship with China.

David Farrar notes Clark's shifting excuses for not raising human rights with Loong:

- No-one asked me to say anything.
- She had not been advised to do so by foreign affairs officials.
- Free speech doesn't meet the threshold for human rights issues.
- Singapore is entitled to have its own laws upheld.




© 2006 Page One Post | Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.